Walk Free+Image
Whistleblowing mechanism (mHRDD pilot)
Does the company describe a grievance mechanism to facilitate whistle-blowing or the reporting of suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking?
20244563
Walk Free
Researched

About the data

Businesses should provide a hotline or other grievance mechanism so that anyone part of or witness to their operations and supply chains may report or flag suspected incidents of slavey or trafficking. As part of business’ responsibility to respect worker’s rights, those affected by modern slavery and those witnessing violations in any part of a company’s operations should be able to freely report incidents. These mechanisms should be clear and transparent, and any incidents should be recorded and monitored. 

This metric is used to assess Duty of Vigilance statements, German Supply Chain Acts reports, and Norwegian Transparency Act reports.

Does the company provide a hotline or reporting mechanism where grievances or suspected incidents of slavery or trafficking can be reported for direct employees and/or supply chains workers?

A whistleblowing mechanisms may include:

  1. A reporting line or hotline that workers can call (reporting managed by third parties, or reporting platforms like a 'Speak Up' tool, not policy, fall in this category too) 

  2. Whistleblower protections for employees so they will not be penalised if they report modern slavery cases (mention of any kind of protection is sufficient e.g. "we ensure that anyone raising such concern will not suffer dismissal, disciplinary action, threats or other unfavourable treatment as a result" ). If the disclosure specifies that grievances can be reported anonymously or confidentially, that also is sufficient for this answer option. Key words: Retaliation, repercussions, fear, reprisal, detriment 

  3. An employee or independent focal point to whom reports can be made. A focal point is in place permanently. If the statement states that reports of violations can be shared with auditors or other personnel operating at the company on a temporary basis, they would not qualify as a focal point.

direct employee is someone who is working directly for the company either in the company head office or in regional offices.

supply chain worker is someone who is employed by contractors or sub-contractors further down the supply chain.

For many companies the risk of forced labour is much greater within their supply chain rather than in their own operations - as such the provision of a mechanism that extends to workers within the company’s supply chain is regarded as a positive step.

Please select as many mechanisms as apply.

NOTE: 'Speak Up' or any other policy can be sufficient to meet the answer 'Hotline, Email, Contact Form' if details are provided specifying how workers' concerns can be raised. If it is not explicitly stated, it cannot be assumed.

Where there is no mention in the statement of who the mechanism applies to, please assume it applies only to direct employees.

If the business indicates it is developing a whistleblowing or grievance mechanism or planning to implement one in the future, please indicate “In Development” and again give details in the comments section.

Please select "No" if no whistleblowing mechanism is described in the statement.

For each value, please include a comment that copies relevant information from the statement. If the policy that you wish to include is not listed, please add a comment and flag the section for review.

Value Type
Multi-Category
Options
Hotline Email Contact Form direct employees
Hotline Email Contact Form supply chain workers
Whistleblower protection direct employees
Whistleblower protection supply chain workers
Focal Point direct employees
Focal Point supply chain workers
In Development direct employees
In Development supply chain workers
No
Research Policy
Community Assessed
Report Type
German Supply Chain Act report (Bericht zum LksG)
,
Vigilance plan (Devoir de Vigilance)
,
Norwegian Transparency Act report
Steward
Aureliane Frohlich
,
Abigail Munroe