About the data
Disclosing a list of suppliers beyond the first tier shows that a brand is working to map deeper levels of their supply chain and takes some responsibility for its direct and indirect sourcing relationships. It can help facilitate the identification and escalation of labour rights and environmental issues by trade unions, NGOs and other stakeholders directly to brands enabling them to take urgent actions to address and remediate issues raised. This is especially important beyond the first tier where brands may not be able to monitor their suppliers as easily.
A note on the scoring system
Wikirate has a standardised 10-point scoring system making it possible to compare company scores across different benchmarks. On Wikirate.org, the Fashion Transparency Index scoring system, where each company can get a maximum of 250 points, has been converted to the 10-point scoring system - with 10 being the highest a company can score and 0 being the lowest. These company scores can also be translated to percentages e.g. if a company has scored 2.5 out of 10 on Wikirate, they have achieved 25% of the 250 points in the Fashion Transparency Index.
Formula
Value | Score |
---|---|
Name of Facility |
1.4
|
Address |
1.4
|
Type of products or services |
1.4
|
Approximate number of workers at each site |
1.4
|
Sex-disaggregated breakdown of workers |
0.7
|
If facility has trade union |
0.7
|
If the facility has an independent worker committee |
0.4
|
% or number of migrant or contract workers |
0.4
|
Name of Parent Company (for each facility if applicable) |
0.4
|
Discloses which tier one facility (or facilities) this processing facility works with |
0.4
|
List is publicly available as a csv or Excel spreadsheet |
0.4
|
Discloses what percentage of processing facilities is published |
0.4
|
Discloses 95% or higher of processing facilities are included in the list/map |
0.4
|
Publishes that this list or map of processing facilities has been updated within the past 6 months |
0.4
|
Nothing |
0.0
|